翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Jan Wiktor Wiśniewski
・ Jan Wildens
・ Jan Wiley
・ Jan Wilhelm Schüssler
・ Jan Wilkens
・ Jan Willem
・ Jan Willem Aten
・ Jan Willem de Jong
・ Jan Willem de Pous
・ Jan Willem de Winter
・ Jan Willem Janssens
・ Jan Willem Klop
・ Jan Willem Nienhuys
・ Jan Willem Pieneman
・ Jan Willem Spruyt
Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen
・ Jan Willem te Kolsté
・ Jan Willem Tellegen
・ Jan Willem van Borselen
・ Jan Willem van den Hondel
・ Jan Willem van Ede
・ Jan Willem van Erven Dorens
・ Jan Willems
・ Jan Willemsz Lapp
・ Jan Willemsz. van der Wilde
・ Jan Williams
・ Jan Williamson
・ Jan Willis
・ Jan Wils
・ Jan Wils (painter)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen : ウィキペディア英語版
Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen
Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen is a consultant in chemistry and energy systems.
Storm van Leeuwen received his Masters in Science, physical chemistry, at the Technical University Eindhoven. He is a senior scientist at Ceedata Consultants. He also develops courses for chemistry teachers for the Open University at Heerlen. He is the secretary of the Dutch Association of the Club of Rome. His two fields of expertise are technology assessment and life cycle analyses of energy systems, focussed on sustainability aspects. He published numerous reports and articles on various topics related to energy and environment.〔(【引用サイトリンク】 title=About the authors (Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen and Philip Bartlett Smith) )
==Nuclear energy study==

He is best known for the paper ''Nuclear power the energy balance'' that he wrote with Philip Smith (also named ''Stormsmith studies''), where they analyzed the energy payback from the entire nuclear power system. The energy inputs were calculated based on various assumptions and guesses about the technologies used in uranium production, rather than actually measuring them. They concluded that the major parameter determining the energy balance was the grade of the uranium ore, and ore grades lower than 180 ppm do not yield an energy gain when used in the nuclear fuel cycle.〔
The study was heavily criticized, such as a rebuttal by researchers from the Paul Scherrer Institute.〔http://gabe.web.psi.ch/pdfs/Critical%20note%20GHG%20PSI.pdf Dones, Roberto, 2007. Critical note on the estimation by storm van Leeuwen J.W. and Smith P. of the energy uses and corresponding CO2 emissions from the complete nuclear energy chain. Paul Scherrer Institute Policy Report, April〕
With further criticism from Sevior and Flitney who issued the following statement:〔〔

''We compared the predicted energy cost (Storm van Leeuwen's study〔 ) of Uranium mining and milling for Ranger, Olympic Dam and Rössing to the energy consumption as reported. All are significantly over predicted (5 PJ, 60 PJ and 69 PJ vs 0.8 PJ, 5 PJ and 1 PJ respectively). ()''
''The energy consumption is predicted to be so large that is comparable to the energy consumption of a particular sub-section of the economy. In the case of Rössing, the over prediction is larger than the energy consumption of the entire country of Namibia.''

Storm van Leeuwen noted that :

''The method of Sevior and Flitney based on financial data appears to me full of hidden assumptions, bookkeeping problems, statistical pitfalls and uncertainties.''

The paper has been used by anti-nuclear organizations to claim that nuclear power is not clean enough to be considered a part of a clean energy mix.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.